From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, fridtjof@fbunet.de,
Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2790!
Date: Mon, 27 Mar 2006 19:28:30 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060327192830.355f184f.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060327213429.GK19434@charite.de>
Ralf Hildebrandt <Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de> wrote:
>
> This happens when umount'ing an intact softraid-5 with vanila 2.6.16.
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/buffer.c:2790!
> invalid opcode: 0000 [#1]
> PREEMPT
> Modules linked in: sata_sil vmnet vmmon snd_seq_oss snd_seq_midi snd_seq_midi_event snd_seq snd_via82xx snd_ac97_codec snd_ac97_bus snd_pcm_oss snd_mixer_oss snd_pcm snd_timer snd_page_alloc snd_mpu401_uart snd_rawmidi snd_seq_device snd soundcore sk98lin
> CPU: 0
> EIP: 0060:[<b015fda9>] Tainted: P VLI
Can you confirm that an untainted kernel does the same thing?
> EFLAGS: 00010246 (2.6.16 #1)
> EIP is at submit_bh+0x109/0x130
> eax: 00000005 ebx: d5e0ed54 ecx: 00000001 edx: 0000002b
> esi: c9a0e000 edi: 00000001 ebp: 000040cd esp: be715cb8
> ds: 007b es: 007b ss: 0068
> Process umount (pid: 7011, threadinfo=be714000 task=e0be3ab0)
> Stack: <0>b13341c0 eeacc160 d5e0ed54 c9a0e000 ed772960 b015fe12 00000001 d5e0ed54
> ed772960 c9a0e000 ed772960 c9a0e000 b01b3da1 d5e0ed54 be714000 ef2d8ae0
> d5e0ed54 be714000 00000a61 b01b25f0 ed772960 00000001 b03b8bf6 0000032a
> Call Trace:
> [<b015fe12>] sync_dirty_buffer+0x42/0xe0
> [<b01b3da1>] journal_update_superblock+0xc1/0xe0
> [<b01b25f0>] cleanup_journal_tail+0xc0/0x190
> [<b03b8bf6>] preempt_schedule_irq+0x46/0x70
> [<b01b2914>] log_do_checkpoint+0x24/0x490
> [<b0142ac2>] __pagevec_free+0x32/0x50
> [<b0144963>] release_pages+0x33/0x220
> [<b03b87c5>] schedule+0x315/0x640
> [<b03b8c6d>] preempt_schedule+0x4d/0x60
> [<b012e22f>] autoremove_wake_function+0x2f/0x60
> [<b01b4e5b>] journal_destroy+0x12b/0x2c0
> [<b0178cc2>] dispose_list+0x82/0x120
> [<b01a767a>] ext3_put_super+0x2a/0x1f0
> [<b01790b3>] invalidate_inodes+0xd3/0x110
We've lost BH_mapped on journal->j_sb_buffer. it's a buffer_head against
the backing blockdev's pagecache. JBD holds a ref on the buffer_head,
which should protect it from, say, invalidate_inode_pages().
If raid5 is doing something to kill the mapped bit in this bh, it must have
been very clever about it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-03-28 3:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-03-27 21:34 Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-03-28 3:28 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060327192830.355f184f.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=Ralf.Hildebrandt@charite.de \
--cc=fridtjof@fbunet.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®