Re: [PATCH -mm] acpi: fix memory_hotplug externs

["Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>]

On Sun, 2 Apr 2006 00:16:41 +0200 Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 28, 2006 at 11:46:55AM -0800, Randy.Dunlap wrote:
> > From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > 
> > Spell CONFIG option correctly so that externs work.
> > Fixes these warnings:
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c:248: warning: implicit declaration of function 'add_memory'
> > drivers/acpi/acpi_memhotplug.c:312: warning: implicit declaration of function 'remove_memory'
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
> > ---
> >  linsrc/linux-2616-mm2/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h |    2 +-
> >  1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > --- rddunlap.orig/linsrc/linux-2616-mm2/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> > +++ rddunlap/linsrc/linux-2616-mm2/include/linux/memory_hotplug.h
> > @@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ static inline int __remove_pages(struct 
> >  }
> >  
> >  #if defined(CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY) \
> > -	|| defined(CONFIG_ACPI_MEMORY_HOTPLUG_MODULE)
> > +	|| defined(CONFIG_ACPI_HOTPLUG_MEMORY_MODULE)
> >  extern int add_memory(u64 start, u64 size);
> >  extern int remove_memory(u64 start, u64 size);
> >  #endif
> 
> What about simply offering the prototypes unconditionally?

duh, yes, that should be OK AFAIK.  Could you do that?

---
~Randy