From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932443AbWDDOPP (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:15:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932211AbWDDOPO (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:15:14 -0400 Received: from mail-in-05.arcor-online.net ([151.189.21.45]:35495 "EHLO mail-in-05.arcor-online.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932210AbWDDOPM (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Apr 2006 10:15:12 -0400 From: Prakash Punnoor To: Nigel Cunningham Subject: Re: Issues with uli526x networking module Date: Tue, 4 Apr 2006 16:15:10 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel , jgarzik@pobox.com References: <200601260900.57951.prakash@punnoor.de> <200603281930.53859.prakash@punnoor.de> <200603290747.38402.ncunningham@cyclades.com> In-Reply-To: <200603290747.38402.ncunningham@cyclades.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1201403.fFoqaPSsLl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200604041615.10749.prakash@punnoor.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --nextPart1201403.fFoqaPSsLl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Am Dienstag M=E4rz 28 2006 23:47 schrieb Nigel Cunningham: > Hi. > > On Wednesday 29 March 2006 03:30, Prakash Punnoor wrote: > > Hi, I am just wondering whether you found out what the issue is with the > > link problem. If you have some patch ready (even if it is hackish) I > > would be happy to use it. > > > > Anyways, I know you are busy with swsusp2. ;-) > > > > Cheers, > > Yes, I do have a patch. It is hackish at the moment because as you've > rightly guessed, I haven't gotten around to finishing it. It also doesn't > work perfectly - I sometimes need to rmmod and insmod after booting a new > kernel to get the link to come up. But, apart from that, it works fine. Thx for sharing it. Unfortunately it doesn't help me. (I am not using suspe= nd=20 or anything on that machine as it is supposed to be running 24/7.) After=20 pulling out the LAN cable and putting it back in. network is dead. The driv= er=20 (even unpatched) sees the cable is back in, but obviously wrongly=20 reinitializes(?) the nic: Ie, kernel says after pluggin cable back in: uli526x: eth0 NIC Link is Up 100 Mbps Full duplex but network is dead. I have to do: ifconfig eth0 down modprobe -r uli526x modprobe uli526x ifconfig eth0 up dhclient And then it works again. =2D-=20 (=B0=3D =3D=B0) //\ Prakash Punnoor /\\ V_/ \_V --nextPart1201403.fFoqaPSsLl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBEMn9uxU2n/+9+t5gRAp3HAKDRdZbU1aDoiO8aMtDvzsxIA+GvlACgvO6R IPSJ8tka5Y9qz2bDslYiIUU= =BGN+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1201403.fFoqaPSsLl--