From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932109AbWDEWuq (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:50:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932115AbWDEWup (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:50:45 -0400 Received: from wildsau.enemy.org ([193.170.194.34]:19083 "EHLO wildsau.enemy.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932109AbWDEWup (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Apr 2006 18:50:45 -0400 From: Herbert Rosmanith Message-Id: <200604052246.k35Mkl6L010288@wildsau.enemy.org> Subject: Re: Q on audit, audit-syscall In-Reply-To: <20060405223052.GE14724@sorel.sous-sol.org> To: Chris Wright Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2006 00:46:47 +0200 (MET DST) CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, Kyle Moffett , Robin Holt , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL100 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > * Herbert Rosmanith (kernel@wildsau.enemy.org) wrote: > > anyway, the manpage describes how auditd/libaudit works - not how it has been > > implemented/how it communicates with the kernel. > > I want to know how it works "under the hood", not just how to use it. > > Then grab the source, and read its READMEs. good point. I was reading netlink.c and libaudit.c. obviously the wrong place ;-) > > LSM depends > > on CONFIG_AUDIT* (this is correct, isn't it?) > > No. >