From: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>
To: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Robert Hancock <hancockr@shaw.ca>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to correct ELCR? - was Re: [PATCH 2.6.16] Shared interrupts sometimes lost
Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 19:07:28 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060411170728.GB1893@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17464.55398.270243.839773@cse.unsw.edu.au>
Hi!
> > > However there is room for a race here. If an event occurs between
> > > the read and the write, then this will NOT de-assert the IRQ line.
> > > It will remain asserted throughout.
> > >
> > > Now if the IRQ is handled as an edge-triggered line (which I believe
> > > they are in Linux), then losing this race will mean that we don't see
> > > any more interrupts on this line.
> >
> > PCI interrupts should always be level triggered, not edge triggered
>
> Ok... so I guess I jumped to the wrong conclusion. Thanks for
> straightening me out.
> But it is behaving like edge-triggered..
>
> So I have explored about the i8259 (wikipedia helped) and discovered
> the ELCR (Edge/Level Control Register). Apparently this is meant to
> be set up by the BIOS to the correct values. It seems that this isn't
> happening.
>
> It seems to get the value 0x0800 which corresponds to IRQ11 being the
> only level-triggered interrupt. But I need IRQ10 to be level
> triggered. I hacked the code to set the 0x0400 bit, and it seems to
> work OK without my other patch.
>
> Now I just need a way to set this correctly at boot time without a
> hack.
>
> I currently have Linux compiled without ACPI support (as I don't
> really want that and being an oldish notebook I gather it has a good
> chance of causing problems) so that isn't fiddling with the ELCR.
Can you try to enable ACPI and/or APIC? Some machines are known to
require APIC...
Pavel
--
Thanks for all the (sleeping) penguins.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-11 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <5Zd5E-3vi-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-08 14:10 ` Robert Hancock
2006-04-09 9:48 ` How to correct ELCR? - was " Neil Brown
2006-04-09 15:48 ` Francois Romieu
2006-04-09 22:28 ` Neil Brown
2006-04-11 17:07 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
2006-04-12 4:01 ` Neil Brown
[not found] ` <5ZoDL-3rE-7@gated-at.bofh.it>
2006-04-09 18:12 ` Robert Hancock
2006-04-09 18:24 ` Lee Revell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060411170728.GB1893@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@suse.cz \
--cc=hancockr@shaw.ca \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®