From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964829AbWDMIxN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:53:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751178AbWDMIxN (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:53:13 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:20200 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751168AbWDMIxM (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 04:53:12 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 01:52:57 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: David Chinner Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: shrink_dcache_sb scalability problem. Message-Id: <20060413015257.5b9d0972.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060413082210.GM1484909@melbourne.sgi.com> References: <20060413082210.GM1484909@melbourne.sgi.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org David Chinner wrote: > > After recently upgrading a build machine to 2.6.16, we started > seeing 10-50s pauses where the machine would appear to hang. This sounds like the recent thread "Avoid excessive time spend on concurrent slab shrinking" over on linux-mm. Have you read through that? http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&r=1&b=200603&w=2 http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-mm&r=3&b=200604&w=2 It ended up somewaht inconclusive, but it looks like we do have a bit of a problem, but it got exacerbated by an XFS slowness.