From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932426AbWDMCK1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:10:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932428AbWDMCK1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:10:27 -0400 Received: from mcr-smtp-001.bulldogdsl.com ([212.158.248.7]:57874 "EHLO mcr-smtp-001.bulldogdsl.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932426AbWDMCK0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Apr 2006 22:10:26 -0400 X-Spam-Abuse: Please report all spam/abuse matters to abuse@bulldogdsl.com From: Alistair John Strachan To: Dan Bonachea Subject: Re: PROBLEM: pthread-safety bug in write(2) on Linux 2.6.x Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 03:10:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <6.2.5.6.2.20060412173852.033dbb90@cs.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20060412173852.033dbb90@cs.berkeley.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604130310.27560.s0348365@sms.ed.ac.uk> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 April 2006 02:45, Dan Bonachea wrote: > Hi - I believe I've discovered a thread-safety bug in the Linux 2.6.x > kernel implementation of write(2). Hi, let's get the obvious out of the way first. Is this reproducible on a current -stable, non-vendor kernel? -- Cheers, Alistair. 'No sense being pessimistic, it probably wouldn't work anyway.' Third year Computer Science undergraduate. 1F2 55 South Clerk Street, Edinburgh, UK.