From: "Randy.Dunlap" <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Flexible mem= parameter
Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:21:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060413162159.5fd64b5e.rdunlap@xenotime.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0604140036510.4365@yvahk01.tjqt.qr>
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 00:49:12 +0200 (MEST) Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> Hello,
>
> mem= can be used to limit the amount of physical memory Linux uses. I
> presume that when specifying mem=256M only the memory from 0x0 to
> 0x10000000 is used. Is there a way to tune mem= so that it will use
> 0x70000000 to 0x80000000? (A compile-time change would suffice.)
>
>
> Background: I am trying to track down a nondeterministic (but
> reproducible) segfault while building big projects like gcc or glibc. I do
> not think it's a memory problem since it only showed up since I changed to
> gcc 4.1.0 and tweaked it to use -mcpu=ultrasparc (rather than -mcpu=v7) by
> default. I had been building gcc4 before with gcc3 a number of times w/o
> problems. I did ran a userspace memtester for approx 20 hours (`memtest`
> from debian).
I've never tried it, but Documentation/kernel-parameters.txt
suggests using mem= along with memmap= to specify an exact memmap.
memmap=nn[KMG]@ss[KMG]
[KNL] Force usage of a specific region of memory
Region of memory to be used, from ss to ss+nn.
Is this on a sparc system or are you just building sparc tools?
I don't know if memmap= works on sparc arch.
---
~Randy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-13 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-13 22:49 Jan Engelhardt
2006-04-13 23:21 ` Randy.Dunlap [this message]
2006-04-18 8:49 ` Denis Vlasenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060413162159.5fd64b5e.rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--to=rdunlap@xenotime.net \
--cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®