From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964777AbWDMSVy (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:21:54 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964784AbWDMSVy (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:21:54 -0400 Received: from smtp-out-02.utu.fi ([130.232.202.172]:37549 "EHLO smtp-out-02.utu.fi") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964777AbWDMSVx (ORCPT ); Thu, 13 Apr 2006 14:21:53 -0400 Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:21:42 +0300 From: Jan Knutar Subject: Re: JVM performance on Linux (vs. Solaris/Windows) In-reply-to: <443E74C1.5090801@mbligh.org> To: "Martin J. Bligh" Cc: K P , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-id: <200604132121.42662.jk-lkml@sci.fi> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline References: <62a080740604130753i4b8bbbckc3cba12092b54226@mail.gmail.com> <443E74C1.5090801@mbligh.org> User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thursday 13 April 2006 18:56, Martin J. Bligh wrote: > SpecJBB is a really frigging stupid benchmark. It's *much* more affected > by the stupid crap in Java (like their locking model) than anything in the > OS. What's even worse is that people actually code by this stupid model...