From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030263AbWDOFzt (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:55:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030265AbWDOFzt (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:55:49 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:21228 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030263AbWDOFzt (ORCPT ); Sat, 15 Apr 2006 01:55:49 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2006 22:55:28 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Randy.Dunlap" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] parport_pc: fix section mismatch warnings Message-Id: <20060414225528.4ec40510.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060414224439.b9a91323.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <20060414224439.b9a91323.rdunlap@xenotime.net> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Randy.Dunlap" wrote: > > This still leaves 5 other PCI-related section mismatches, but I > don't think that they are a real problem unless there are some > hotplug-parport cards out there. If needed, I'll fix those too. It would be good to do so, please. Ideally we'll end up with zero such warnings, so any ones which newly appear will be obvious, so nobody will ever submit a patch which generates new warnings (hah).