From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750993AbWDQU3P (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:29:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751105AbWDQU3P (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:29:15 -0400 Received: from 216-99-217-87.dsl.aracnet.com ([216.99.217.87]:10113 "EHLO sorel.sous-sol.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750993AbWDQU3O (ORCPT ); Mon, 17 Apr 2006 16:29:14 -0400 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2006 13:27:51 -0700 From: Chris Wright To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: Chris Wright , James Morris , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Stephen Smalley , T?r?k Edwin , linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Time to remove LSM (was Re: [RESEND][RFC][PATCH 2/7] implementation of LSM hooks) Message-ID: <20060417202751.GC3615@sorel.sous-sol.org> References: <200604072138.35201.edwin@gurde.com> <1144863768.32059.67.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <200604142301.10188.edwin@gurde.com> <1145290013.8542.141.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417162345.GA9609@infradead.org> <1145293404.8542.190.camel@moss-spartans.epoch.ncsc.mil> <20060417173319.GA11506@infradead.org> <20060417202037.GB3615@sorel.sous-sol.org> <1145305493.2847.86.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1145305493.2847.86.camel@laptopd505.fenrus.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Arjan van de Ven (arjan@infradead.org) wrote: > On Mon, 2006-04-17 at 13:20 -0700, Chris Wright wrote: > > * James Morris (jmorris@namei.org) wrote: > > > How about enough time to get us to 2.6.18, say, two months? > > > > Based on the discussions we had last year, I think the fair date would > > be August not June. > > why? > this is already a year notice... > lets get it over with.. notice goes in now > removal to -mm, goes into 2.6.18 Because the discussion we had at OLS last year (late July) was if there are no users in one year, it is gone. > as it is its one helluva hook for the rootkit guys with only pain on the > kernel side (eg selinux) because of the super abstraction. The rootkit argument is not that compelling. Lack of users certainly is. thanks, -chris