From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750902AbWDRKOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:14:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750894AbWDRKOn (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:14:43 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:24467 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750818AbWDRKOm (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 06:14:42 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 03:13:55 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pavel@suse.cz, kernel@kolivas.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] swsusp: rework memory shrinker Message-Id: <20060418031355.7370b1e6.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200604181201.53430.rjw@sisk.pl> References: <200604181201.53430.rjw@sisk.pl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org "Rafael J. Wysocki" wrote: > > Rework the swsusp's memory shrinker in the following way: And what was the observed effect of all this? > + /* Force reclaiming mapped pages in the passes #3 and #4 */ > + if (pass > 2) { > + sc.may_swap = 1; > + vm_swappiness = 100; > + } That's a bit klunky. Maybe we should move swappiness into scan_control.