From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750764AbWDRJzY (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:55:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750773AbWDRJzX (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:55:23 -0400 Received: from [205.233.219.253] ([205.233.219.253]:9442 "EHLO conifer.conscoop.ottawa.on.ca") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750764AbWDRJzP (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:55:15 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 05:45:40 -0400 From: Jody McIntyre To: Stefan Richter Cc: Dan Dennedy , linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, Adrian Bunk , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] the overdue removal of RAW1394_REQ_ISO_{LISTEN,SEND} Message-ID: <20060418094540.GO5346@conscoop.ottawa.on.ca> References: <20060406224706.GD7118@stusta.de> <44374FC0.3070507@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <200604081218.24544.dan@dennedy.org> <443813C4.9090000@s5r6.in-berlin.de> <443814AA.1040707@s5r6.in-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <443814AA.1040707@s5r6.in-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Apr 08, 2006 at 09:53:14PM +0200, Stefan Richter wrote: > We should have added such warnings already to the kernel at the moment > when the two ioctls went into feature-removal-schedule.txt. We originally decided just to put it into libraw1394. I don't see the point of having it in two places, but I suppose it couldn't hurt.. I'll take a patch :) Cheers, Jody > -- > Stefan Richter > -=====-=-==- -=-- -=--- > http://arcgraph.de/sr/ --