From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932179AbWDROZh (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:25:37 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932202AbWDROZh (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:25:37 -0400 Received: from gateway-1237.mvista.com ([63.81.120.158]:30477 "EHLO dhcp153.mvista.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932179AbWDROZg (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Apr 2006 10:25:36 -0400 Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2006 07:25:29 -0700 Message-Id: <200604181425.k3IEPTAC027793@dhcp153.mvista.com> From: Daniel Walker To: mingo@elte.hu CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH -rt] Remove double history Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Assuming you don't want it in there twice . Signed-Off-By: Daniel Walker Index: linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c =================================================================== --- linux-2.6.16.orig/kernel/rt.c +++ linux-2.6.16/kernel/rt.c @@ -19,17 +19,6 @@ * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes, * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too. * - * historic credit for proving that Linux spinlocks can be implemented via - * RT-aware mutexes goes to many people: The Pmutex project (Dirk Grambow - * and others) who prototyped it on 2.4 and did lots of comparative - * research and analysis; TimeSys, for proving that you can implement a - * fully preemptible kernel via the use of IRQ threading and mutexes; - * Bill Huey for persuasively arguing on lkml that the mutex model is the - * right one; and to MontaVista, who ported pmutexes to 2.6. - * - * This code is a from-scratch implementation and is not based on pmutexes, - * but the idea of converting spinlocks to mutexes is used here too. - * * lock debugging, locking tree, deadlock detection: * * Copyright (C) 2004, LynuxWorks, Inc., Igor Manyilov, Bill Huey