From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751122AbWDTQ0o (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:26:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751126AbWDTQ0o (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:26:44 -0400 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.13]:7565 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751122AbWDTQ0o (ORCPT ); Thu, 20 Apr 2006 12:26:44 -0400 From: Ingo Oeser To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:24:26 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: Diego Calleja , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe References: <20060419200001.fe2385f4.diegocg@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604201824.27616.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, On Wednesday, 19. April 2006 20:44, Linus Torvalds wrote: > Or, rather than just a boring socket->socket forwarding, you could, for > example, forward data that comes from a MPEG-4 hardware encoder, and tee() > it to duplicate the stream, and write one of the streams to disk, and the > other one to a socket for a real-time broadcast. Again, all without > actually physically copying it around in memory. Yes! That's what I've been after for some time now. Thanks everyone. Regards Ingo Oeser