From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751242AbWDUTJc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:09:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751261AbWDUTJc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:09:32 -0400 Received: from [83.101.156.75] ([83.101.156.75]:11529 "EHLO raad.intranet") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751242AbWDUTJb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 15:09:31 -0400 From: Al Boldi To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [ckrm-tech] [RFC] [PATCH 00/12] CKRM after a major overhaul Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 22:07:44 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200604212207.44266.a1426z@gawab.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chandra Seetharaman wrote: > On Fri, 2006-04-21 at 07:49 -0700, Dave Hansen wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 19:24 -0700, sekharan@us.ibm.com wrote: > > > CKRM has gone through a major overhaul by removing some of the > > > complexity, cutting down on features and moving portions to userspace. > > > > What do you want done with these patches? Do you think they are ready > > for mainline? -mm? Or, are you just posting here for comments? > > We think it is ready for -mm. But, want to go through a review cycle in > lkml before i request Andrew for that. IMHO, it would be a good idea to decouple the current implementation and reconnect them via an open mapper/wrapper to allow a more flexible/open approach to resource management, which may ease its transition into mainline, due to a step-by-step instead of an all-or-none approach. Thanks! -- Al