From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964784AbWDUVPc (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:15:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964786AbWDUVPb (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:15:31 -0400 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.13]:41159 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964784AbWDUVPa (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Apr 2006 17:15:30 -0400 From: Ingo Oeser To: "Gross, Mark" Subject: Re: Problems with EDAC coexisting with BIOS Date: Fri, 21 Apr 2006 23:13:06 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: bluesmoke-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, "LKML" , "Carbonari, Steven" , "Ong, Soo Keong" , "Wang, Zhenyu Z" References: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D998732@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> In-Reply-To: <5389061B65D50446B1783B97DFDB392D998732@orsmsx411.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604212313.08791.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Mark, On Friday, 21. April 2006 18:01, Gross, Mark wrote: > I'm sorry to have to bring up these issues after a fare amount of good > work, and I don't know how this problem managed to get by for as long as > it has, but there are some issues with the EDAC and the BIOS for managed > computer systems. Can this condition be detected via DMI? Then you could implement a whitelist or blacklist and a module parameter to override it. Regards Ingo Oeser