From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: sekharan@us.ibm.com
Cc: herbert@13thfloor.at, torvalds@osdl.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com,
xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, stern@rowland.harvard.edu
Subject: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem?
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:03:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060424150314.2de6373d.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1145913967.1400.59.camel@linuxchandra>
Chandra Seetharaman <sekharan@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the steps. With that i was able to reproduce the problem and
> i found the bug.
>
> While i go ahead and generate the patch, i wanted to hear if my
> conclusion is correct.
>
> The problem is due to the fact that most notifier registrations
> incorrectly use __devinitdata to define the callback structure, as in:
>
> static struct notifier_block __devinitdata hrtimers_nb = {
> .notifier_call = hrtimer_cpu_notify,
> };
>
> devinitdata'd data is not _expected to be available_ after the
> initialization(unless CONFIG_HOTPLUG is defined).
>
> I do not know how it was working until now :), anybody has a theory that
> can explain it (or my conclusion is wrong) ?
That sounds right. There are several __devinitdata notifier_blocks in the
tree - please be sure to check them all.
btw, it'd be pretty trivial to add runtime checking for this sort of thing:
int addr_in_init_section(void *addr)
{
return addr >= __init_begin && addr < __init_end;
}
(x86-specific)
(need to add __init_end to vmlinux.lds.S)
then we could use that to check various things in various places...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-24 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-19 3:27 Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 7:30 ` [patch, 2.6.17-rc2] dm: fix typo Ingo Molnar
2006-04-19 7:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2006-04-19 18:00 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Diego Calleja
2006-04-19 18:04 ` Hua Zhong
2006-04-19 19:40 ` splice and tee [was Linux 2.6.17-rc2] Jonathan Corbet
2006-04-19 18:44 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 19:20 ` Grzegorz Kulewski
2006-04-19 20:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 21:23 ` Trond Myklebust
2006-04-19 21:49 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-19 22:19 ` Peter Naulls
2006-04-20 13:21 ` Diego Calleja
2006-04-20 14:50 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 19:19 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 18:40 ` Linh Dang
2006-04-20 19:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:57 ` Linh Dang
2006-04-20 20:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-21 7:53 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 20:08 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:26 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-20 19:34 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:39 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-20 19:44 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-20 19:54 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-20 21:37 ` Piet Delaney
2006-04-20 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 23:39 ` Piet Delaney
2006-04-21 0:09 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-20 23:26 ` David Lang
2006-04-21 0:49 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-22 4:52 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2006-04-21 0:41 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-21 17:58 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-21 18:15 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 18:42 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-04-21 0:20 ` David S. Miller
2006-04-21 2:05 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-21 6:47 ` Piet Delaney
2006-04-20 16:24 ` Ingo Oeser
2006-04-20 19:52 ` splice(), vmsplice() niftiness [was: Re: Linux 2.6.17-rc2] bjd
2006-04-21 10:21 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-21 16:40 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-21 17:21 ` Stephen Rothwell
2006-04-21 22:02 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-22 0:53 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-22 1:07 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-22 13:21 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-04-21 11:01 ` Linux 2.6.17-rc2 - notifier chain problem? Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-21 21:31 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-22 0:58 ` Herbert Poetzl
2006-04-24 21:26 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-24 22:03 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-04-24 23:01 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-24 23:28 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-25 0:19 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-26 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-26 18:18 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-26 18:43 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-26 19:29 ` Ashok Raj
2006-04-26 20:21 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-26 20:26 ` Ashok Raj
2006-04-28 23:12 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-28 23:23 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-28 23:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-28 23:48 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-28 23:43 ` Chandra Seetharaman
2006-04-29 15:30 ` Alan Stern
2006-04-22 6:40 ` Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060424150314.2de6373d.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=herbert@13thfloor.at \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=sekharan@us.ibm.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome