From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932126AbWDXXu1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:50:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932127AbWDXXu1 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:50:27 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:15825 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932126AbWDXXu0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 19:50:26 -0400 Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:52:52 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, aherrman@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch 5/13] s390: qdio memory allocations. Message-Id: <20060424165252.1282e0f0.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060424150348.GF15613@skybase> References: <20060424150348.GF15613@skybase> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > > - ssqd_area = (void *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA); > + ssqd_area = mempool_alloc(qdio_mempool_scssc, GFP_ATOMIC); I assume the loss of GFP_DMA was intentional?