From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+willy=40w.ods.org-S1751072AbWDXUP4@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751072AbWDXUP4 (ORCPT <rfc822;willy@w.ods.org>);
	Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:15:56 -0400
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750971AbWDXUP4
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:15:56 -0400
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49039 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750836AbWDXUP4 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 24 Apr 2006 16:15:56 -0400
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:15:54 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Gary Poppitz <poppitzg@iomega.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: C++ pushback
Message-ID: <20060424201553.GA14772@infradead.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Gary Poppitz <poppitzg@iomega.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
References: <4024F493-F668-4F03-9EB7-B334F312A558@iomega.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <4024F493-F668-4F03-9EB7-B334F312A558@iomega.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i
X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from <hch@infradead.org> by pentafluge.infradead.org
	See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 02:02:27PM -0600, Gary Poppitz wrote:
> >We know they are "incompatible", why else would we allow "private" and
> >"struct class" in the kernel source if we some how expected it to work
> >with a C++ compiler?
> 
> 
> I can see that this was intentional, not an oversight.
> 
> If there is a childish temper tantrum mentality about C++ then I have  
> no reason or desire to be on this list.

so sodd off.