From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751200AbWDXT74 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:59:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751202AbWDXT74 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:59:56 -0400 Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de ([80.67.18.13]:39651 "EHLO smtprelay01.ispgateway.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751200AbWDXT74 (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Apr 2006 15:59:56 -0400 From: Ingo Oeser To: Michael Holzheu Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] s390: Hypervisor File System Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 21:57:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: In-Reply-To: Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mschwid2@de.ibm.com, "Pekka Enberg" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604242157.19120.ioe-lkml@rameria.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Michael, On Monday, 24. April 2006 19:17, you wrote: > I agree that it is a good idea to specify the characters to > reject, but I would like to use the function without having an > additional local pointer variable. In my opinion this > functionality is enough for most cases. AFAIK there is no Standard for this kind of functions. Yes, it might be ok, if you like to destroy the string. But I prefer non-destructive string handling :-) Might be a matter of taste. So go wild, if nobody else objects. Regards Ingo Oeser