From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932136AbWDYIwt (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:52:49 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932145AbWDYIwt (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:52:49 -0400 Received: from wohnheim.fh-wedel.de ([213.39.233.138]:62856 "EHLO wohnheim.fh-wedel.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932136AbWDYIws (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Apr 2006 04:52:48 -0400 Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 10:52:30 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?J=F6rn?= Engel To: Pekka Enberg Cc: Michael Holzheu , ioe-lkml@rameria.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mschwid2@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] s390: Hypervisor File System Message-ID: <20060425085230.GA23127@wohnheim.fh-wedel.de> References: <20060424191941.7aa6412a.holzheu@de.ibm.com> <1145948304.11463.5.camel@localhost> <1145950336.11463.8.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1145950336.11463.8.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 25 April 2006 10:32:16 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote: > > Hmm, thinking about this, I think a better API would be to not have that > reject parameter at all. Would something like this be accetable for your > use? [...] > + while (*s && isspace(*s)) > + s++; Just checking. This does remove a newline, right? Jörn -- When in doubt, punt. When somebody actually complains, go back and fix it... The 90% solution is a good thing. -- Rob Landley