From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932135AbWDZQ4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:56:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932285AbWDZQ4m (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:56:42 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:53656 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932135AbWDZQ4l (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 12:56:41 -0400 Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:55:11 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jens Axboe Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, npiggin@suse.de, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: Lockless page cache test results Message-Id: <20060426095511.0cc7a3f9.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060426135310.GB5083@suse.de> References: <20060426135310.GB5083@suse.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jens Axboe wrote: > > Running a splice benchmark on a 4-way IPF box, I decided to give the > lockless page cache patches from Nick a spin. I've attached the results > as a png, it pretty much speaks for itself. It does. What does the test do? In particular, does it cause the kernel to take tree_lock once per page, or once per batch-of-pages?