From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932433AbWDZNR0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:17:26 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932429AbWDZNR0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:17:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:38578 "EHLO mx1.suse.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932428AbWDZNRZ (ORCPT ); Wed, 26 Apr 2006 09:17:25 -0400 From: Andi Kleen To: "Brown, Len" Subject: Re: [(repost) git Patch 1/1] avoid IRQ0 ioapic pin collision Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 15:17:05 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 Cc: "Kimball Murray" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@digeo.com, kmurray@redhat.com, natalie.protasevich@unisys.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604261517.06505.ak@suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tuesday 25 April 2006 21:53, Brown, Len wrote: > I'd rather see the original irq-renaming patch > and its subsequent multiple via workaround patches > reverted than to further complicate what is becoming > a fragile mess. Sorry rechecking - i already got the patch now. You want me to drop it again? I guess we could drop it all, but VIA must still work afterwards. How would we do that? -Andi