From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751758AbWD0XHI (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:07:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751760AbWD0XHI (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:07:08 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:6630 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751758AbWD0XHH (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:07:07 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:06:04 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Adrian Bunk Cc: James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] let X86_VOYAGER depend on SMP Message-Id: <20060427160604.66b2a297.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060427203350.GR3570@stusta.de> References: <20060427203350.GR3570@stusta.de> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I noted that X86_VOYAGER=y and SMP=n doesn't compile. > > It might be possible to fix this, but as far as I understand it, all > Voyager machines are SMP, implying that such a configuration doesn't > make much sense. I was kinda waiting for James to express an opinion. In theory it'd be better to make uniproc-on-Voyager build, boot and run like the wind. In practice, this patch looks practical ;)