From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751061AbWD0RU1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:20:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750959AbWD0RU1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:20:27 -0400 Received: from mailfe10.swipnet.se ([212.247.155.33]:48547 "EHLO swip.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750746AbWD0RU0 (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Apr 2006 13:20:26 -0400 X-T2-Posting-ID: KOikJrdL7LwNU9E7lpGMzWVS2MIh7gpHPSCSN1tL6ME= X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] From: Leonard Peterson To: Roman Kononov Subject: Re: C++ pushback (when does this religious thread end?) Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 19:20:37 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.2 Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20060426034252.69467.qmail@web81908.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604271920.37208.l.pinguin_N0$PAM@gmail.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org What about support for JAVA-modules in the kernel? Or modules written in C#? In my opinion there are many decent languages (just like C++) and I am convinced that there are people out there who think that the Linux kernel should support any language they can imagine, because it has such and such nice/good/robust/etc. feature. Neither C or C++ sucks, its just the programmer that sucks. So Please, end this religious discussion, it leads to nowhere... Leonard