From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030294AbWD1HeQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:34:16 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030299AbWD1HeQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:34:16 -0400 Received: from filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu ([130.245.126.2]:11932 "EHLO filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030294AbWD1HeQ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:34:16 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 03:33:58 -0400 From: Josef Sipek To: Martin Schwidefsky Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com Subject: Re: [patch 11/13] s390: instruction processing damage handling. Message-ID: <20060428073358.GA15166@filer.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu> References: <20060424150544.GL15613@skybase> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060424150544.GL15613@skybase> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 24, 2006 at 05:05:44PM +0200, Martin Schwidefsky wrote: > +++ linux-2.6-patched/drivers/s390/s390mach.c 2006-04-24 16:47:28.000000000 +0200 ... > +#define MAX_IPD_TIME (5 * 60 * 100 * 1000) /* 5 minutes */ I'm no s390 expert, but shouldn't the above use something like HZ? Josef 'Jeff' Sipek.