From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932457AbWD1XxT (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:53:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932464AbWD1XxT (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:53:19 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:14496 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932457AbWD1XxT (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:53:19 -0400 Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:55:34 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Jeff Dike Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17 Message-Id: <20060428165534.6067f5aa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200604281601.k3SG11MJ007510@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> References: <200604281601.k3SG11MJ007510@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.0 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-vine-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Dike wrote: > > These patches are 2.6.17 material. "remove NULL checks and add some CodingStyle" isn't. Unless one considers UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;) So I gave that one an extra-special look - I'll push it along, thanks.