From: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Lockless page cache test results
Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 19:58:53 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200604281958.53888.a1426z@gawab.com> (raw)
Wu Fengguang wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 01:12:00PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de> wrote:
> > > With a 16-page gang lookup in splice, the top profile for the 4-client
> > > case (which is now at 4GiB/sec instead of 3) are:
> > >
> > > samples % symbol name
> > > 30396 36.7217 __do_page_cache_readahead
> > > 25843 31.2212 find_get_pages_contig
> > > 9699 11.7174 default_idle
> >
> > __do_page_cache_readahead() should use gang lookup. We never got around
> > to that, mainly because nothing really demonstrated a need.
>
> I have been testing a patch for this for a while. The new function
> looks like
>
> static int
> __do_page_cache_readahead(struct address_space *mapping, struct file
> *filp, pgoff_t offset, unsigned long nr_to_read) {
> struct inode *inode = mapping->host;
> struct page *page;
> LIST_HEAD(page_pool);
> pgoff_t last_index; /* The last page we want to read */
> pgoff_t hole_index;
> int ret = 0;
> loff_t isize = i_size_read(inode);
> last_index = ((isize - 1) >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT);
>
> if (unlikely(!isize || !nr_to_read))
> goto out;
> if (unlikely(last_index < offset))
> goto out;
> if (last_index > offset + nr_to_read - 1 &&
> offset < offset + nr_to_read)
> last_index = offset + nr_to_read - 1;
> /*
> * Go through ranges of holes and preallocate all the absent
> pages. */
> next_hole_range:
> cond_resched();
> read_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> hole_index = radix_tree_scan_hole(&mapping->page_tree,
> offset, last_index - offset + 1);
>
> if (hole_index > last_index) { /* no more holes? */
> read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> goto submit_io;
> }
> offset = radix_tree_scan_data(&mapping->page_tree, (void **)&page,
> hole_index, last_index);
> read_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>
> ddprintk("ra range %lu-%lu(%p)-%lu\n", hole_index, offset, page,
> last_index);
>
> for (;;) {
> page = page_cache_alloc_cold(mapping);
> if (!page)
> break;
> page->index = hole_index;
> list_add(&page->lru, &page_pool);
> ret++;
> BUG_ON(ret > nr_to_read);
> if (hole_index >= last_index)
> break;
> if (++hole_index >= offset)
> goto next_hole_range;
> }
> submit_io:
> /*
> * Now start the IO. We ignore I/O errors - if the page is not
> * uptodate then the caller will launch readpage again, and
> * will then handle the error.
> */
> if (ret)
> read_pages(mapping, filp, &page_pool, ret);
> BUG_ON(!list_empty(&page_pool));
> out:
> return ret;
> }
> The radix_tree_scan_data()/radix_tree_scan_hole() functions called
> above are more flexible than the original __lookup(). Perhaps we can
> rebase radix_tree_gang_lookup() and find_get_pages_contig() on them.
>
> If it is deemed ok, I'll clean it up and submit the patch asap.
Can you patch it up for 2.6.16 asap?
Thanks!
--
Al
next reply other threads:[~2006-04-28 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-04-28 16:58 Al Boldi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-04-26 13:53 Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 14:43 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-26 19:46 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 5:39 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-27 6:07 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-27 6:15 ` Andi Kleen
2006-04-27 7:51 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-04-26 16:55 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-26 17:42 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 18:10 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-26 18:23 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 18:46 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-26 19:21 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 5:58 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-26 18:34 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-26 18:47 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-26 18:48 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-26 18:49 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 20:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2006-04-28 14:01 ` David Chinner
2006-04-28 14:10 ` David Chinner
2006-04-30 9:49 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-30 11:20 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-30 11:39 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-30 11:44 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-26 18:58 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-04-26 19:02 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 19:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-26 19:15 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-26 20:12 ` Andrew Morton
2006-04-27 7:45 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 7:47 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-27 8:02 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-27 9:00 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 13:36 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-27 8:36 ` Jens Axboe
[not found] ` <20060428112835.GA8072@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-04-28 11:28 ` Wu Fengguang
2006-04-27 5:49 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-27 15:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-28 4:54 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-28 5:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-04-27 9:35 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 5:22 ` Nick Piggin
2006-04-26 18:57 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 2:19 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-04-27 8:03 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 11:16 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-27 11:41 ` KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki
2006-04-27 11:45 ` Jens Axboe
2006-04-28 9:10 ` Pavel Machek
2006-04-28 9:21 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200604281958.53888.a1426z@gawab.com \
--to=a1426z@gawab.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®