From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750748AbWD2Pqe (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:46:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750750AbWD2Pqe (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:46:34 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:57297 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750748AbWD2Pqd (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 11:46:33 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 08:44:30 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Blaisorblade Cc: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jdike@addtoit.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17 Message-Id: <20060429084430.27ea0d91.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <200604291641.19864.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> References: <200604281601.k3SG11MJ007510@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060428165534.6067f5aa.akpm@osdl.org> <200604291641.19864.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.0.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Blaisorblade wrote: > > > Unless one considers > > UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;) > > Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple > times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of > all the conflicts we (me and Jeff) would get with patches in our queues. Lindent doesn't do a terribly good job, and one ends up having to perform a lot of manual fixups. Perhaps as many as are presently needed.