From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030229AbWD2AVZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:21:25 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030253AbWD2AVZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:21:25 -0400 Received: from fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp ([192.51.44.37]:39647 "EHLO fgwmail7.fujitsu.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030229AbWD2AVZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 28 Apr 2006 20:21:25 -0400 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 09:21:08 +0900 From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki To: Andrew Morton Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, lhms-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, greg@kroah.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] catch valid mem range at onlining memory Message-Id: <20060429092108.42e47940.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> In-Reply-To: <20060428163409.389e895e.akpm@osdl.org> References: <20060428114732.e889ad2d.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com> <20060428163409.389e895e.akpm@osdl.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0 (GTK+ 2.6.10; i686-pc-mingw32) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 28 Apr 2006 16:34:09 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > This all looks fairly (but trivially) dependent upon the 64-bit-resource > patches in Greg's tree. yes. > Greg, were you planning on merging them in the post-2.6.17 flood? > For kdump, I'm glad if it can be mergerd. -Kame