From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750735AbWD2Ol1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:41:27 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750736AbWD2Ol1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:41:27 -0400 Received: from smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com ([217.12.11.34]:17585 "HELO smtp003.mail.ukl.yahoo.com") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750735AbWD2Ol0 (ORCPT ); Sat, 29 Apr 2006 10:41:26 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.it; h=Received:From:To:Subject:Date:User-Agent:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Disposition:Message-Id; b=cL0kUxzKFXr7W6fBW2NY8ZmGEU7Zj52ZaLi8lGvZVS/faQ1BPkYP0gTNjMtI2dRKPfMXhWRJmG28lksbWvDL/hSoAzj8jAn4LVVCkBLt6KwXhn2N7AfE8nC3cCPzTTYNXjKdlHhl5McNp0Wd4czUHwU6WltiSyTOeQBr9P+/QI0= ; From: Blaisorblade To: user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [uml-devel] Re: [PATCH 0/6] UML - Small patches for 2.6.17 Date: Sat, 29 Apr 2006 16:41:18 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 Cc: Andrew Morton , Jeff Dike , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <200604281601.k3SG11MJ007510@ccure.user-mode-linux.org> <20060428165534.6067f5aa.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <20060428165534.6067f5aa.akpm@osdl.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604291641.19864.blaisorblade@yahoo.it> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Saturday 29 April 2006 01:55, Andrew Morton wrote: > Jeff Dike wrote: > > These patches are 2.6.17 material. > > "remove NULL checks and add some CodingStyle" isn't. Being restrictive is ok, but keeping patches in queues for longer than needed creates more headaches than it solves, in my experience. > Unless one considers > UML coding style to be a bug, which is an attractive idea ;) Well, we're slowly working on that... very slowly... I've thought multiple times to at least run Lindent on arch/um but I've not spoken up because of all the conflicts we (me and Jeff) would get with patches in our queues. However, there are occasions in which we get conflicts anyway for other reorganization, and in that case Lindent would be useful. Ok Jeff? I'm speaking for instance about moving to os-Linux and such. -- Inform me of my mistakes, so I can keep imitating Homer Simpson's "Doh!". Paolo Giarrusso, aka Blaisorblade (Skype ID "PaoloGiarrusso", ICQ 215621894) http://www.user-mode-linux.org/~blaisorblade ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it