From: Willy Tarreau <willy@w.ods.org>
To: Jesper Juhl <jesper.juhl@gmail.com>
Cc: "Daniel Aragonés" <danarag@gmail.com>,
"Andrew Morton" <akpm@osdl.org>,
"Pekka Enberg" <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
"Arjan van de Ven" <arjan@infradead.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC] Requested changelog for minix filesystem update to V3
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:43:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060501134338.GA11191@w.ods.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a8748490605010606j70a25cdcqe23b1c0684a1f710@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Jesper,
just a comment below :
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:06:49PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On 5/1/06, Daniel Aragonés <danarag@gmail.com> wrote:
[snip]
> >- i = ((numbits-(numblocks-1)*BLOCK_SIZE*8)/16)*2;
> >+ i = ((numbits-(numblocks-1)*bh->b_size*8)/16)*2;
>
> A few more spaces please :
>
> i = ((numbits-(numblocks-1) * bh->b_size * 8) / 16) * 2;
This spacing is still wrong, because I first read it like this :
i = (((numbits-(numblocks-1)) * bh->b_size * 8) / 16) * 2;
While in fact it's :
i = ((numbits-((numblocks-1) * bh->b_size * 8)) / 16) * 2;
Strictly speaking, this should be written this way :
i = ((numbits - (numblocks - 1) * bh->b_size * 8) / 16) * 2;
Or at least :
i = ((numbits - (numblocks-1) * bh->b_size * 8) / 16) * 2;
Anyway, it's a good sign when only spaces are being discussed on a piece
of code ;-)
Cheers,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-01 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-01 9:25 Daniel Aragonés
2006-05-01 9:34 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-01 9:34 ` Pekka Enberg
2006-05-01 12:00 ` Jiri Slaby
2006-05-01 13:06 ` Jesper Juhl
2006-05-01 13:43 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2006-05-01 14:21 ` Jesper Juhl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060501134338.GA11191@w.ods.org \
--to=willy@w.ods.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=danarag@gmail.com \
--cc=jesper.juhl@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®