mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, torvalds@osdl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] symlink nesting level change
Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:19:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060504071910.GI27946@ftp.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060503183554.87f0218d.akpm@osdl.org>

On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 06:35:54PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> It's a non-back-compatible change which means that people will install
> 2.6.18+, will set stuff up which uses more that five nested links and some
> will discover that they can no longer run their software on older kernels.
> 
> It'll only hurt a very small number of people, but for those people, it
> will hurt a lot.  And I can't really think of anything we can do to help
> them, apart from making the new behaviour runtime-controllable, defaulting
> to "off", but add a once-off printk when we hit MAX_NESTED_LINKS, pointing
> them at a document which tells them how to turn on the new behaviour and
> which explains the problems.  Which sucks.

Those people keep asking to lift that limit.  So no, I don't believe that
making it runtime-controllable is the right thing to do.  Document that
we'd lifted the limit to 8 and such setups become possible since <version>.
 
> But I guess as major distros are 2.6.16-based, this is a good time to make
> this change.

FWIW, RH kernels had that for more than a year by now...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2006-05-04  7:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-02 18:05 Too many levels of symbolic links Brian D. McGrew
2006-05-03  1:52 ` Linda Walsh
2006-05-03  2:57   ` H. Peter Anvin
2006-05-03  3:08     ` [PATCH] symlink nesting level change Al Viro
2006-05-04  1:35       ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-04  6:55         ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-05-04  7:19         ` Al Viro [this message]
2006-07-13 18:35         ` Tim Pepper
2006-07-13 21:27           ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-17 20:58     ` Too many levels of symbolic links Tim Pepper
2006-05-18 19:20       ` Tim Pepper

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060504071910.GI27946@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --to=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome