From: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
To: viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, dwalker@mvista.com, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 15:31:29 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060510.153129.122741274.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060510221024.GH27946@ftp.linux.org.uk>
From: Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:10:24 +0100
> But that's the argument in favour of using diff, not shutting the
> bogus warnings up...
IMHO, the tree should build with -Werror without exception.
Once you have that basis, new ones will not show up easily
and the hard part of the battle has been won.
Yes, people will post a lot of bogus versions of warning fixes, but
we're already good at flaming those off already :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-10 22:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-10 2:56 Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 14:31 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 15:09 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 15:06 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 15:24 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 16:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 17:18 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 17:45 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 18:27 ` Stephen Hemminger
2006-05-10 19:07 ` Serge Belyshev
2006-05-10 20:24 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 20:35 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 20:36 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-10 20:53 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 19:20 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 19:49 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 20:44 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 21:11 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:20 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 21:33 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:39 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 21:45 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 21:48 ` Al Viro
2006-05-11 6:36 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-10 15:39 ` Alan Cox
2006-05-10 15:38 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 16:21 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 16:37 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 16:42 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 17:25 ` Daniel Walker
2006-05-10 19:55 ` Alistair John Strachan
2006-05-10 22:03 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 22:10 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 22:31 ` David S. Miller [this message]
2006-05-10 22:45 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:05 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-10 23:20 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:45 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-11 1:28 ` Al Viro
2006-05-11 8:11 ` Steven Rostedt
2006-05-11 10:07 ` [PATCH -mm] introduce a false positive macro Steven Rostedt
2006-05-11 20:40 ` [PATCH -mm] sys_semctl gcc 4.1 warning fix Adrian Bunk
2006-05-11 21:14 ` Al Viro
2006-05-10 23:06 ` Roland Dreier
2006-05-10 22:30 ` David S. Miller
2006-05-11 2:58 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060510.153129.122741274.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=dwalker@mvista.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®