From: Winn Johnston <winn_johnston@yahoo.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
Date: Thu, 11 May 2006 11:03:19 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060511180320.49788.qmail@web52901.mail.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060511173312.GI25010@moss.sous-sol.org>
Error:
kernel: hdi: drive_cmd: status=0xd0 { Busy }
kernel: ide: failed opcode was: 0xea
BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0!
the odd thing is the system experiences a hard lockup,
so it is not a false positive. I am working on a
trace, but it is hard to get.
My supervisor has asked me to help research this
problem. We are using multiple ata cards in our backup
machine. We have a Promiss sata 300tx4, and three ATA
cards (3 SIG UltraATA 133 PCI) or (3 promise ultra
100tx2). We are experiencing hard lockups. The system
resides on a scsi drive connected to the on board
controler Adaptec AIC-7899P (Tyan S2462
motherboard)the error is repeated for all drives
connected to the promis cards, and the error continues
until a lock up is eventualy reached.
Also, its in dma mode, not pio.
PREEMPT_NONE is already set, so its not the preemption
model
possibly related posts
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0309.1/0444.html
http://groups.google.com/group/linux.kernel/browse_thread/thread/450966ffa3043609/59e6a2350b7690bf?lnk=st&q=kernel%3A+ide%3A+failed+opcode+was%3A+0xea%22+BUG%3A+soft+lockup+detected+on+CPU%230!%22&rnum=1&hl=en#59e6a2350b7690bf
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-11 18:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-11 2:25 Linux 2.6.16.16 Chris Wright
2006-05-11 2:29 ` Chris Wright
2006-05-11 10:34 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2006-05-11 11:07 ` Nick Warne
2006-05-11 16:50 ` Daniel Barkalow
2006-05-11 17:33 ` Chris Wright
2006-05-11 18:03 ` Winn Johnston [this message]
2006-05-12 15:51 ` BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Winn Johnston
2006-05-13 15:35 ` Linux 2.6.16.16 Ingo Oeser
2006-05-13 15:56 ` Adrian Bunk
2006-05-13 17:29 ` Nick Warne
2006-05-14 3:59 ` Greg KH
2006-05-14 5:17 ` Willy Tarreau
2006-05-15 17:57 ` Chris Wright
2006-05-14 7:46 ` Maciej Soltysiak
2006-05-15 16:30 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-07-25 19:41 BUG: soft lockup detected on CPU#0! Christoph Pfister
2007-07-27 19:30 ` Michal Piotrowski
2007-07-27 20:04 ` Christoph Pfister
2007-08-07 8:49 ` Christoph Pfister
2007-07-14 11:19 CIJOML
2007-05-09 12:41 Ralf Hildebrandt
2006-06-02 1:02 Marc Koschewski
2006-06-02 1:04 ` Marc Koschewski
2006-06-02 1:54 ` Andrew Morton
2006-03-05 12:26 Norbert Wegener
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060511180320.49788.qmail@web52901.mail.yahoo.com \
--to=winn_johnston@yahoo.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®