[patch] Cleanups to Doc*/SubmittingPatches

[Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>]

This cleans up Submitting patches a bit. Missing/inconsistent full
stops, mostly.

Signed-off-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz>

diff --git a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
index c2c85bc..07b87ce 100644
--- a/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
+++ b/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
@@ -173,17 +173,17 @@ copy the maintainer when you change thei
 For small patches you may want to CC the Trivial Patch Monkey
 trivial@kernel.org managed by Adrian Bunk; which collects "trivial"
 patches. Trivial patches must qualify for one of the following rules:
- Spelling fixes in documentation
+ Spelling fixes in documentation.
  Spelling fixes which could break grep(1).
- Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad)
- Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct)
- Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things)
+ Warning fixes (cluttering with useless warnings is bad).
+ Compilation fixes (only if they are actually correct).
+ Runtime fixes (only if they actually fix things).
  Removing use of deprecated functions/macros (eg. check_region).
- Contact detail and documentation fixes
+ Contact detail and documentation fixes.
  Non-portable code replaced by portable code (even in arch-specific,
- since people copy, as long as it's trivial)
- Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file. (ie. patch monkey
- in re-transmission mode)
+ since people copy, as long as it's trivial).
+ Any fix by the author/maintainer of the file (ie. patch monkey
+ in re-transmission mode).
 URL: <http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/bunk/trivial/>
 
 
@@ -246,13 +246,13 @@ updated change.
 It is quite common for Linus to "drop" your patch without comment.
 That's the nature of the system.  If he drops your patch, it could be
 due to
-* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version
+* Your patch did not apply cleanly to the latest kernel version.
 * Your patch was not sufficiently discussed on linux-kernel.
-* A style issue (see section 2),
-* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section)
-* A technical problem with your change
-* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle
-* You are being annoying (See Figure 1)
+* A style issue (see section 2).
+* An e-mail formatting issue (re-read this section).
+* A technical problem with your change.
+* He gets tons of e-mail, and yours got lost in the shuffle.
+* You are being annoying.
 
 When in doubt, solicit comments on linux-kernel mailing list.
 
@@ -475,22 +475,22 @@ SECTION 3 - REFERENCES
 Andrew Morton, "The perfect patch" (tpp).
   <http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt>
 
-Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format."
+Jeff Garzik, "Linux kernel patch submission format".
   <http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html>
 
-Greg Kroah-Hartman "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
+Greg Kroah-Hartman, "How to piss off a kernel subsystem maintainer".
   <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/03/31/>
   <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/07/08/>
   <http://www.kroah.com/log/2005/10/19/>
   <http://www.kroah.com/log/2006/01/11/>
 
-NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!.
+NO!!!! No more huge patch bombs to linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org people!
   <http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=112112749912944&w=2>
 
-Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle
+Kernel Documentation/CodingStyle:
   <http://sosdg.org/~coywolf/lxr/source/Documentation/CodingStyle>
 
-Linus Torvald's mail on the canonical patch format:
+Linus Torvalds's mail on the canonical patch format:
   <http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/4/7/183>
 --
 Last updated on 17 Nov 2005.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html