From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc subsystem, fix capability checks in kernel interface
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:57:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060517235740.757f69a1.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060517021156.34cce7c9@inspiron>
Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it> wrote:
>
>
> Remove CAP_SYS_XXX checks from the in kernel interface. Those
> functions are meant to be used in-kernel only.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> ---
> drivers/rtc/interface.c | 22 ++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
>
> --- linux-rtc.orig/drivers/rtc/interface.c 2006-05-17 01:18:19.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-rtc/drivers/rtc/interface.c 2006-05-17 01:41:17.000000000 +0200
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ int rtc_irq_set_state(struct class_devic
> unsigned long flags;
> struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(class_dev);
>
> + if (rtc->ops->irq_set_state == NULL)
> + return -ENXIO;
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
> if (rtc->irq_task != task)
> err = -ENXIO;
> @@ -243,25 +246,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtc_irq_set_state);
>
> int rtc_irq_set_freq(struct class_device *class_dev, struct rtc_task *task, int freq)
> {
> - int err = 0, tmp = 0;
> + int err = 0;
> unsigned long flags;
> struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(class_dev);
>
> - /* allowed range is 2-8192 */
> - if (freq < 2 || freq > 8192)
> - return -EINVAL;
> -/*
> - FIXME: this does not belong here, will move where appropriate
> - at a later stage. It cannot hurt right now, trust me :)
> - if ((freq > rtc_max_user_freq) && (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)))
> - return -EACCES;
> -*/
> - /* check if freq is a power of 2 */
> - while (freq > (1 << tmp))
> - tmp++;
> -
> - if (freq != (1 << tmp))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + if (rtc->ops->irq_set_freq == NULL)
> + return -ENXIO;
>
> spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
> if (rtc->irq_task != task)
The changelog and the patch don't have much correlation.
Are you sure this was the right patch?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-18 6:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-17 0:11 Alessandro Zummo
2006-05-18 6:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-18 8:12 ` Alessandro Zummo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060517235740.757f69a1.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®