mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc subsystem, fix capability checks in kernel interface
Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 23:57:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060517235740.757f69a1.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060517021156.34cce7c9@inspiron>

Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it> wrote:
>
> 
>  Remove CAP_SYS_XXX checks from the in kernel interface. Those
>  functions are meant to be used in-kernel only.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@towertech.it>
> ---
>  drivers/rtc/interface.c |   22 ++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
> 
> --- linux-rtc.orig/drivers/rtc/interface.c	2006-05-17 01:18:19.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-rtc/drivers/rtc/interface.c	2006-05-17 01:41:17.000000000 +0200
> @@ -229,6 +229,9 @@ int rtc_irq_set_state(struct class_devic
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(class_dev);
>  
> +	if (rtc->ops->irq_set_state == NULL)
> +		return -ENXIO;
> +
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
>  	if (rtc->irq_task != task)
>  		err = -ENXIO;
> @@ -243,25 +246,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtc_irq_set_state);
>  
>  int rtc_irq_set_freq(struct class_device *class_dev, struct rtc_task *task, int freq)
>  {
> -	int err = 0, tmp = 0;
> +	int err = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	struct rtc_device *rtc = to_rtc_device(class_dev);
>  
> -	/* allowed range is 2-8192 */
> -	if (freq < 2 || freq > 8192)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -/*
> -	FIXME: this does not belong here, will move where appropriate
> -	at a later stage. It cannot hurt right now, trust me :)
> -	if ((freq > rtc_max_user_freq) && (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE)))
> -		return -EACCES;
> -*/
> -	/* check if freq is a power of 2 */
> -	while (freq > (1 << tmp))
> -		tmp++;
> -
> -	if (freq != (1 << tmp))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> +	if (rtc->ops->irq_set_freq == NULL)
> +		return -ENXIO;
>  
>  	spin_lock_irqsave(&rtc->irq_task_lock, flags);
>  	if (rtc->irq_task != task)

The changelog and the patch don't have much correlation.

Are you sure this was the right patch?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-05-18  6:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-05-17  0:11 Alessandro Zummo
2006-05-18  6:57 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2006-05-18  8:12   ` Alessandro Zummo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20060517235740.757f69a1.akpm@osdl.org \
    --to=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=alessandro.zummo@towertech.it \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®