From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932387AbWETVjv (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 17:39:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932385AbWETVjv (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 17:39:51 -0400 Received: from mail.kroah.org ([69.55.234.183]:62888 "EHLO perch.kroah.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932384AbWETVju (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 May 2006 17:39:50 -0400 Date: Sat, 20 May 2006 14:21:35 -0700 From: Greg KH To: Matthew Wilcox Cc: Patrick Mansfield , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: dev_printk output Message-ID: <20060520212135.GB24672@kroah.com> References: <20060511150015.GJ12272@parisc-linux.org> <20060512170854.GA11215@us.ibm.com> <20060513050059.GR12272@parisc-linux.org> <20060518183652.GM1604@parisc-linux.org> <20060518200957.GA29200@us.ibm.com> <20060519201142.GB2826@parisc-linux.org> <20060519202847.GB8865@kroah.com> <20060520045544.GD2826@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060520045544.GD2826@parisc-linux.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 10:55:44PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:28:47PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:11:42PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > > On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 01:09:57PM -0700, Patrick Mansfield wrote: > > > > Funky how loading sd after sg changes the output ... and using the driver > > > > name as a prefix sometimes messes this up for scsi. > > > > > > > > 0:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 > > > > sd 1:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0 > > > > > > I find that a bit confusing too. Obviously, we should distinguish > > > different kinds of bus_id from each other somehow -- but isn't the > > > obvious thing to use the bus name? That must already be unique as sysfs > > > relies on it. ie this patch: > > > > Yes, not all devices are on a bus, so this will not work. And we want > > to know the driver that controls the device too. So how about adding > > the bus if it's not null? > > > > Something like (untested): > > printk(level "%s %s %s: " format , (dev)->bus ? (dev)->bus->name : "", (dev)->driver ? (dev)->driver->name : "", (dev)->bus_id , ## arg) > > Then we still get the inconsistency of device names changing as drivers > are loaded. The bus id doesn't change, just the "hint" as to who is controling it at that point in time. Which is something that is needed/wanted by a lot of people. > I think we should declare it a bug for devices to not be on a bus. No! We have a few places already that are devices with no related bus, and are only getting more and more with the shift away from class_device to device (see a patch in my quilt tree that allows this.) thanks, greg k-h