From: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
To: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>,
"Stephen C. Tweedie" <sct@redhat.com>,
"ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
<ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sector_t overflow in block layer
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 02:14:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060522001402.GB25184@elf.ucw.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0605182307540.16178@hermes-1.csi.cam.ac.uk>
Hi!
> > Why isn't that just a
> >
> > if (unlikely(sector != (sector_t)sector))
> >
> > and that's it? What does this have to do with CONFIG_LBD or BITS_PER_LONG,
> > or anything at all?
> >
> > If the sector number fits in a sector_t, we're all good.
>
> I think you missed that Andrewas said he is worried about 64-bit overflows
> as well. And you would not catch those with the sector !=
Can 64-bit really overflow? That's 16 000 Peta bytes, AFAICS. Does
anyone really have disk array over 100 Peta bytes? How much space does
Google have, for example?
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-05-22 0:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1147849273.16827.27.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <m3odxxukcp.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
[not found] ` <1147884610.16827.44.camel@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <m34pzo36d4.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
[not found] ` <1147888715.12067.38.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <m364k4zfor.fsf@bzzz.home.net>
[not found] ` <20060517235804.GA5731@schatzie.adilger.int>
[not found] ` <1147947803.5464.19.camel@sisko.sctweedie.blueyonder.co.uk>
2006-05-18 18:59 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-05-18 20:58 ` Alexey Dobriyan
2006-05-18 21:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-18 22:12 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-05-18 22:41 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-05-18 23:23 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-05-19 19:36 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-05-19 20:11 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 20:55 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-05-19 21:15 ` Andrew Morton
2006-05-19 21:05 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2006-05-18 22:43 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-05-22 0:14 ` Pavel Machek [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060522001402.GB25184@elf.ucw.cz \
--to=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=ext2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®