From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru
Cc: draghuram@rocketmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, bidulock@openss7.org
Subject: Re: Question about tcp hash function tcp_hashfn()
Date: Wed, 31 May 2006 23:18:39 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060531.231839.10909081.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20060601061234.GB28087@2ka.mipt.ru>
From: Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>
Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 10:12:36 +0400
> I've present the new simple code and test results which show
> that folded and not folded Jenkins hashes _do_ produce _exactly_ the
> same distribution.
Ok I believe you now :)
> I think I've already said that fairly distributed values being xored
> produce still fairly distributed value, so parts of 32bit fairly
> distributed hash after being xored with each other still produce fairly
> distributed 32bit space.
It would make a good research paper for someone mathmatically
inclined enough :)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-01 6:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-05-31 4:29 Raghuram
2006-05-31 5:55 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 7:10 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 7:45 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 7:49 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 8:00 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:03 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 9:12 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 9:44 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 9:51 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 10:58 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 11:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 13:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-05-31 18:29 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:12 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:18 ` David Miller [this message]
2006-06-01 6:22 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:24 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 18:41 ` David Miller
2006-06-01 6:04 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:18 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 6:30 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 6:46 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 7:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 7:11 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 8:38 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 10:24 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 11:06 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-01 18:40 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-01 20:21 ` David Miller
2006-06-02 7:01 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-02 5:40 ` Florian Weimer
2006-06-02 7:48 ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2006-06-02 15:10 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-06-02 17:26 ` Florian Weimer
2006-06-02 17:37 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:52 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 8:49 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
2006-05-31 9:02 ` David Miller
2006-05-31 9:39 ` Brian F. G. Bidulock
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060531.231839.10909081.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=bidulock@openss7.org \
--cc=draghuram@rocketmail.com \
--cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®