From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750806AbWFAIqr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:46:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750792AbWFAIqr (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:46:47 -0400 Received: from smtp.osdl.org ([65.172.181.4]:65209 "EHLO smtp.osdl.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750806AbWFAIqq (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 04:46:46 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 01:50:59 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Martin Peschke Cc: tim.bird@am.sony.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [Patch 3/6] statistics infrastructure - prerequisite: timestamp Message-Id: <20060601015059.56d5953f.akpm@osdl.org> In-Reply-To: <447EA800.101@de.ibm.com> References: <1148055080.2974.15.camel@dyn-9-152-230-71.boeblingen.de.ibm.com> <4474CD38.5090206@am.sony.com> <447EA800.101@de.ibm.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.4 (GTK+ 2.8.17; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 01 Jun 2006 10:40:32 +0200 Martin Peschke wrote: > Or, Andrew, do you prefer a replacement patch for my > statistics-infrastructure-prerequisite-timestamp.patch > that introduces this miscalculation. I could put > statistics-infrastructure-make-printk_clock-a-generic-kernel-wide-nsec-resolution.patch > into that one as well, so that all the timestamp related printk-changes are in > one place. umm, finest-possible-granularity patches against rc5-mm2 would be preferred if poss. I have scripts and tricks to do the topolgical patchsort so that things end up in a logical patch series.