From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750804AbWFAW2n (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:28:43 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750820AbWFAW2n (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:28:43 -0400 Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:65421 "HELO xenotime.net") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750804AbWFAW2m (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Jun 2006 18:28:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:31:25 -0700 From: "Randy.Dunlap" To: Anssi Hannula Cc: dtor_core@ameritech.net, linux-joystick@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org Subject: Re: input: fix comments and blank lines in new ff code Message-Id: <20060601153125.b8f7672a.rdunlap@xenotime.net> In-Reply-To: <447F6725.9010806@gmail.com> References: <20060530105705.157014000@gmail.com> <20060530110131.136225000@gmail.com> <20060530222122.069da389.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <447F3AE4.6010206@gmail.com> <20060601125256.de2897f4.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <447F47FD.2050705@gmail.com> <20060601130923.38f83fb6.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20060601204716.GA6847@delta.onse.fi> <20060601143356.f5b8d4f5.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <447F6725.9010806@gmail.com> Organization: YPO4 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.5 (GTK+ 2.8.3; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 02 Jun 2006 01:16:05 +0300 Anssi Hannula wrote: > > I've no problem with Thunderbird anymore as I configured it to use > gmail.com TLS SMTP server instead for emails where From is my gmail.com > address. However I can't send inline patches using Thunderbird, only > MIME attachments (they are in cleartext and have "Content-Disposition: > inline", however). check out http://mbligh.org/linuxdocs/Email/Clients/Thunderbird I have also written a few emails about how to use thunderbird successfully, but I don't have links to them... :( > The patch was sent with another client to avoid using a MIME attachment, > but that client was configured for my ISP's SMTP server. > > I don't really know if a MIME attachment or "wrong" From email address > is a bigger nuisance. For me, it's attachments. Especially if you make the first line of your patch be the correct: From: your name > > And I noticed one function name _input_ff_erase(). > > That might be a namespace violation... anyone know the namespace > > rules? > > Namespace violation? Never heard of that one. Kernel (usually?) uses names of the form xyz_abc or __xyz_abc, not (one underscore) _xyz_abc. Has something to do with POSIX namespace, but I don't know more about it. --- ~Randy