From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751340AbWFBI7U (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 04:59:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751342AbWFBI7U (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 04:59:20 -0400 Received: from gprs189-60.eurotel.cz ([160.218.189.60]:60319 "EHLO amd.ucw.cz") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751340AbWFBI7U (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 04:59:20 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 10:58:32 +0200 From: Pavel Machek To: Ondrej Zajicek Cc: "Antonino A. Daplas" , David Lang , Jon Smirl , Dave Airlie , "D. Hazelton" , Alan Cox , Kyle Moffett , Manu Abraham , linux cbon , Helge Hafting , Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: OpenGL-based framebuffer concepts Message-ID: <20060602085832.GA25806@elf.ucw.cz> References: <20060519224056.37429.qmail@web26611.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <200605272245.22320.dhazelton@enter.net> <9e4733910605272027o7b59ea5n5d402dabdd7167cb@mail.gmail.com> <200605280112.01639.dhazelton@enter.net> <21d7e9970605281613y3c44095bu116a84a66f5ba1d7@mail.gmail.com> <9e4733910605281759j2e7bebe1h6e3f2bf1bdc3fc50@mail.gmail.com> <447CBEC5.1080602@gmail.com> <20060602083604.GA2480@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20060602083604.GA2480@localhost.localdomain> X-Warning: Reading this can be dangerous to your mental health. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060126 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Pá 02-06-06 10:36:04, Ondrej Zajicek wrote: > On Wed, May 31, 2006 at 05:53:09AM +0800, Antonino A. Daplas wrote: > > David Lang wrote: > > > On Sun, 28 May 2006, Jon Smirl wrote: > > So even a dumb driver such as vesafb that has to do on the fly > > color conversions while pushing 64x more data to the bus can be > > faster than vgacon. > > I just implemented text mode switch and tileblit ops into viafb > (http://davesdomain.org.uk/viafb/index.php) and it is about four > times faster than accelerated graphics mode and about eight times > faster than unaccelerated graphics mode (both measured using cat > largefile with ypan disabled). So textmode is meaningful > alternative. I mean.... it is displaying text faster than refresh rate... so who cares? You can only *display* so much text a second (and then, user is only able to see *much* less text) and both text mode and frame buffers are way past that limits. so.... who cares? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html