From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751420AbWFBNkN (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:40:13 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751419AbWFBNkN (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:40:13 -0400 Received: from dtp.xs4all.nl ([80.126.206.180]:38242 "HELO abra2.bitwizard.nl") by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1751420AbWFBNkL (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 Jun 2006 09:40:11 -0400 Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2006 15:40:09 +0200 From: Erik Mouw To: "Abu M. Muttalib" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, k.oliver@t-online.de, jes@sgi.com Subject: Re: __alloc_pages: 0-order allocation failed (Jes Sorensen) Message-ID: <20060602134009.GE2051@harddisk-recovery.nl> References: <20060602122016.GC2051@harddisk-recovery.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Harddisk-recovery.com User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing in e-mail? A: No. Q: Should I leave quotations after my reply? On Fri, Jun 02, 2006 at 07:00:26PM +0530, Abu M. Muttalib wrote: > I anticipated that my application which was running perfectly on > linux-2.4.19-rmk7-pxa1 box will run as it is on linux-2.6.13 box as well. > But alas, this is not the case and I fail to understand why it is so? ;-( I can't tell you. I don't have the source of your application and I my crystal ball is getting old so I can't read the kernel messages from your screen. Anyway, try to recreate the problem with a *recent* 2.6 kernel. If you can still recreate your problem, post a log over here. Erik -- +-- Erik Mouw -- www.harddisk-recovery.com -- +31 70 370 12 90 -- | Lab address: Delftechpark 26, 2628 XH, Delft, The Netherlands