From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au
Subject: Re: [minor fix] radixtree: regulate tag get return value
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 02:11:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20060604021105.1ce7d727.akpm@osdl.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <349410738.29011@ustc.edu.cn>
On Sun, 4 Jun 2006 16:45:48 +0800
Wu Fengguang <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn> wrote:
> Andrew, this small patch makes the radixtree tester program from
> http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/rtth.tar.gz
> run OK, with the latest radix tree code in linux-2.6.17-rc5-mm2.
>
> It regulates the return value to 0/1 for functions
> radix_tree_tag_get() and radix_tree_tagged().
>
Well yes. But it slows down the kernel. It would be better to fix rtth.
> ---
>
> --- linux.orig/lib/radix-tree.c
> +++ linux/lib/radix-tree.c
> @@ -156,7 +156,7 @@ static inline void tag_clear(struct radi
> static inline int tag_get(struct radix_tree_node *node, unsigned int tag,
> int offset)
> {
> - return test_bit(offset, node->tags[tag]);
> + return !! test_bit(offset, node->tags[tag]);
> }
test_bit() is (sadly) defined to return 0 or 1. Did this really make a difference?
> static inline void root_tag_set(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned int tag)
> @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static inline void root_tag_clear_all(st
>
> static inline int root_tag_get(struct radix_tree_root *root, unsigned int tag)
> {
> - return root->gfp_mask & (1 << (tag + __GFP_BITS_SHIFT));
> + return !! (root->gfp_mask & (1 << (tag + __GFP_BITS_SHIFT)));
> }
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-04 9:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20060604084548.GA5609@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-06-04 8:45 ` Wu Fengguang
2006-06-04 9:11 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
[not found] ` <20060604111754.GA5984@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-06-04 11:17 ` Wu Fengguang
2006-06-04 20:18 ` Andrew Morton
[not found] ` <20060604112636.GB5984@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2006-06-04 11:26 ` [PATCH] radixtree: normalize radix_tree_tag_get() " Wu Fengguang
2006-06-05 3:07 [minor fix] radixtree: regulate tag get " Chuck Ebbert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20060604021105.1ce7d727.akpm@osdl.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au \
--cc=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®