From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932435AbWFEHA4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:00:56 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932437AbWFEHA4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:00:56 -0400 Received: from electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com ([213.41.134.224]:7378 "EHLO fr.zoreil.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932435AbWFEHA4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 03:00:56 -0400 Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 08:58:57 +0200 From: Francois Romieu To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: merging new drivers (was Re: 2.6.18 -mm merge plans) Message-ID: <20060605065856.GA1313@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20060604135011.decdc7c9.akpm@osdl.org> <20060605013223.GD17361@havoc.gtf.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060605013223.GD17361@havoc.gtf.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organisation: Land of Sunshine Inc. Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Jeff Garzik : [...] > In general, I'm a bit disappointed at the time it takes new drivers to > reach the upstream kernel. I grant that a lot of vendor drivers are > unreadable, unmergable shite... but on the other side of the coin, I > see a lot of decent drivers get stalled simply because they aren't > perfect. Could you provide an informal list of a few drivers which are currently stalled ? -- Ueimor