From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750784AbWFEVHD (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:07:03 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750825AbWFEVHB (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:07:01 -0400 Received: from wildsau.enemy.org ([193.170.194.34]:21148 "EHLO wildsau.enemy.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750784AbWFEVHA (ORCPT ); Mon, 5 Jun 2006 17:07:00 -0400 From: Herbert Rosmanith Message-Id: <200606052101.k55L1YJM010151@wildsau.enemy.org> Subject: Re: UDF: buggy? libdvdread vs. udf fs driver In-Reply-To: <200606052056.k55Ku7mR010143@wildsau.enemy.org> To: Herbert Rosmanith Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2006 23:01:34 +0200 (MET DST) CC: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL100 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > a closer look reveals that wrudf tries to read() into > a buffer-address of NIL. and the winner is .... initIO() ! it will malloc() a 64kb buffer. but only if medium==CDRW. if the medium is a diskimage, the buffer-pointer will remain 0x0000000 (or "NIL"). kind regards, h.rosmanith