From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932110AbWFFHjr (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:39:47 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932119AbWFFHjq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:39:46 -0400 Received: from nyota.cc.fh-lippe.de ([193.16.112.78]:11663 "EHLO nyota.cc.fh-lippe.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932110AbWFFHjq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 03:39:46 -0400 Envelope-to: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:39:43 +0200 From: Martin Hierling To: "J. Bruce Fields" Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.16.18 with general protection fault, perhaps nfsd Message-ID: <20060606073943.GB10020@cc.fh-luh.de> References: <20060531164707.GA19547@cc.fh-luh.de> <20060531204716.GL13682@fieldses.org> <20060601115313.GB4561@cc.fh-luh.de> <20060605175229.GL16064@fieldses.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060605175229.GL16064@fieldses.org> X-URL: http://www.fh-luh.de/skim/netzwerk.html User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Skim-SendBy: pike.cc.fh-luh.de on Tue, 06 Jun 2006 09:39:44 +0200 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Bruce, Hi List, > > > > [4] Linux version 2.6.16.18-xen (root@defiant) > > > Is there a xen patch applied as well? > > sure. 3.0.2-2 > Well, this isn't a problem I can reproduce myself, and reading through > the code I don't see how this could happen. So, grasping at straws a > bit, the only thing I can think to suspect is the xen patch. I can't > find any "3.0.2-2" patch anywhere, though; where can I find that code? http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/xen-3.0.2-2-src.tgz but as i wrote some days ago i found a memory error, so it did not happen since then because i swapped the RAM. thanks for your investigation. Martin