From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932154AbWFFNHq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:07:46 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932155AbWFFNHq (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:07:46 -0400 Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:53947 "EHLO pickle.fieldses.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932154AbWFFNHp (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:07:45 -0400 Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 09:07:43 -0400 To: Martin Hierling Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Kernel 2.6.16.18 with general protection fault, perhaps nfsd Message-ID: <20060606130743.GB29283@fieldses.org> References: <20060531164707.GA19547@cc.fh-luh.de> <20060531204716.GL13682@fieldses.org> <20060601115313.GB4561@cc.fh-luh.de> <20060605175229.GL16064@fieldses.org> <20060606073943.GB10020@cc.fh-luh.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060606073943.GB10020@cc.fh-luh.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11+cvs20060403 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 09:39:43AM +0200, Martin Hierling wrote: > Hi Bruce, Hi List, > > > > > > > [4] Linux version 2.6.16.18-xen (root@defiant) > > > > Is there a xen patch applied as well? > > > sure. 3.0.2-2 > > Well, this isn't a problem I can reproduce myself, and reading through > > the code I don't see how this could happen. So, grasping at straws a > > bit, the only thing I can think to suspect is the xen patch. I can't > > find any "3.0.2-2" patch anywhere, though; where can I find that code? > > http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/Research/SRG/netos/xen/downloads/xen-3.0.2-2-src.tgz > > but as i wrote some days ago i found a memory error, so it did not > happen since then because i swapped the RAM. > > thanks for your investigation. Whoops, sorry, missed that.--b.